Casino Expansion

What is happening?

The new operator of the slots at Western Fair, Gateway Casinos and Entertainment Ltd, a BC-based company, has announced plans for a $200 million expansion.

I will be posting more information on this page as it becomes available. Please post your questions in the feedback box below (post "keep me updated") to be adding to the list for notifications when more info becomes available.

News Coverage

London Free Press, 9 May 2017

Blackburn News, 9 May 2017

What questions do you have about this proposed expansion?


Showing 13 reactions

  • commented 2017-05-19 17:14:38 -0400
    I do not live in your community but I do believe residents should be aware of some facts. The Ontario Liberals and the OLG are pushing to outsource all casino operations across Ontario to various private investors. The problem is, this isn’t actual privatization of the OLG, its much worse than that scenario, it’s fake privatization. A government monopoly (OLG) is giving a geographic monopoly to a private company to run various OLG casinos for the province for a 20 year contract.


    As a direct result of the OLGs Modernization Plan, in total over 8,000 OLG employees across the province will lose or have already lost their jobs, with the OLG, as well all employees pension language was removed in their collective agreements. The OLG top brass believe in outsourcing jobs for the little guy but not for themselves. Ironically, all the fat cats at the OLG head office, that is the ones on the sunshine list that make over $100,000 each in salary, will keep their government jobs, while front line workers making less than $40,000 lose their pensions.


    The Liberals and the OLG are only looking at a short term gain of outside money is currently being pumped into various OLG facilities through awarding 20 year contracts, the OLG/Ontario government will get an influx of revenue, something that will help Wynne balance the books but will damage the future Ontario government revenue stream. The big losers in this gamble are the Ontario taxpayers. The reason being, future revenue from casino operations in Niagara will go to private operators pockets rather than all money going than back to the government coffers. As everyone is aware all OLG deals are made behind closed doors, the public doesn’t know what percentage of future profits is going to the investors and the potential for conflict of interest is huge.
    The question you should be asking who is going to profit from this? Who are the political insiders that will benefit? Certainly not the Ontario taxpayer, certainly not the municipality as current Casino employees are worried one of the sites will shut down as they will both be operated by the same private company.
  • commented 2017-05-17 18:40:04 -0400
    Only question i have is when do we get started? Great for london. Keep all that money in london as people will not be traveling to windsor or niagara falls or brantford
  • commented 2017-05-17 18:37:43 -0400
    As a senior, going to the slots is a social event and win lose or draw, I have fun. I track my results so that my “hobby” does not have a negative impact on my budget, and I particularly enjoy morning outings when the crowds are smaller and the people familiar. As a single person, dining out, movies and other couples’ activities do not appeal to me. An enlarged venue would eliminate my out-of-town trips to play at the bigger casinos.
  • commented 2017-05-17 12:29:15 -0400
    The slots at the Western Fair are already busy, however they draw an older demographic to the area. Younger people looking for fun and entertainment do not select that area of the city as a destination.


    With the creation of a full casino and resort style venue, the East End could see an economic boom by attracting a younger crowd with money to spend. If this is done correctly, by incorporating high end restaurants, entertainment, and places to stay, this could attract people from out of town as well. Great for the area, and the city.
  • commented 2017-05-17 10:03:22 -0400
    London needs this for jobs and it will bring in people this is an entertainment area People will Only go elseware we need it here
  • commented 2017-05-16 23:36:14 -0400
    A full casino, hotel and venues would certainly boost the economy and…jobs! I am all for more going to addiction counselling not only for the counselling where needed, but again…jobs! My guess is people addicted to gambling are finding places to gamble, with or without a casino.

    Personally I’d likely see shows and would partake in a poker tournament now and then.
  • commented 2017-05-16 22:19:23 -0400
    Do people not realize, there already is a casino in London?!? The only question is to renovate and make it bigger. I say yes, London needs something that will provide jobs for people that are above minimum wage, have benefits, full time positions etc.


    Everyone is so quick to judge that it’s bad, and it brings addictions. Have we closed down liquor stores? No, we’ve expanded them into our grocery stores…. In my mind London would be stupid not to allow the Casino to expand. People are already travelling to other cities and spending their money elsewhere since London doesn’t have table games. This could be something really great for London. You can’t say we don’t need extra jobs.


    My vote: YES x 3
  • commented 2017-05-16 21:51:55 -0400
    Against this. That parking lot is full all hours of the day. People aren’t going there at 10am to have a night out. They are going because they are addicted. This is a government sponsored plague on our society which should be lessened and not broadened.
  • commented 2017-05-15 07:53:54 -0400
    Seems to have worked out well in Brantford. It’s been a good job development opportunity and they’re decent jobs, not just your run of the mill minimum wage retail/grocery store type thing. It also brings in people from out of town. Yes there are drawbacks, folks who gamble with money they shouldn’t be gambling , but I dont think it’s a good idea to prevent what could be a good thing for the City just for the sake of helping people who can’t help themselves.
  • commented 2017-05-15 07:48:07 -0400
    I do not feel Casinos have a positive contribution to society. Gambling can be an addiction, and you can just see the number of personal bankruptcies that have occurred in the city of Windsor since they have had their Casino. It is well documented. I know because I am from Windsor. If the Casino does go ahead, which it probably will, I would like to see much of the revenue go towards addiction services for gamblers who have addictions. I would also like to see some of the revenue go towards improving the neighbourhood directly around the Casino.
  • commented 2017-05-10 12:09:21 -0400
    Jesse,


    I’d prefer that there was not a casino in the neighbourhood, I don’t think they provide a lot of positive value to society. I don’t think we have a lot of choice in this matter though.


    A couple of questions,

    1) How much money does the city get each year from the OLG as part of the revenue sharing?

    2) Assuming this will lead to an increase in that revenue, is it possible to see a portion specifically devoted to gambling addiction support and a portion specifically devoted to improvements in OEV and the other surrounding neighbourhoods?
  • commented 2017-05-10 11:11:05 -0400
    I would like to know the breakdown of revenue sharing for all parties.


    Also, what is the oversight mechanism to ensure the 20 year relationship between OLG and Gateway adheres to high ethical standards, public scrutiny, transparency and accountability? We have seen some very disappointing actions from OLG in the past.
  • commented 2017-05-10 10:04:26 -0400
    Support. There are a ton of people who are traveling elsewhere to find real table games. Having them stay in town will allow the money to go to our city’s coffers.