As reported in the media, the transportation network company, Uber, is now available in London

Launched in 2009 in San Francisco, Uber has grown rapidly since 2012 and is now operating in more than 300 cities worldwide. In most markets, the company has faced legal challenges to its operation related to municipal taxi bylaws. Generally, municipalities regulate transportation services like taxis and limousines to protect consumers from unfair business practices and to enhance public safety.

Operating in a highly regulated industry with significant barriers to entry, taxi licence holders, brokerages and many drivers are strongly opposed to Uber being unregulated while they are regulated. They are also concerned about the impact of this new kind of transportation service on their earnings and their investment in vehicles and taxi licences ("plates"). More information about the City of London's taxi and limousine regulatory approach is available on the city web site. As set out in the taxi and limousine bylaw, the number of cab owner licences is limited to one for every 1,100 residents of the City of London (for example: 333 licences for a population of 366,151 (2011 Census)). The number of accessible cab owner licences is fixed at one for every 18 cab owner licences (e.g. 333 / 18 = 19 accessible cab owner licences).

In Canada, Uber is available in Toronto, Montreal, Edmonton, Ottawa, Quebec City and Halifax. Recently, Uber has started operating in Southwestern Ontario, including Kitchener-Waterloo and Hamilton.

Various jurisdictions have responded differently to the introduction of Uber to their markets. In 2013, the California Public Utilities Commission created the definition of a transportation network company and regulated this new kind of online-enabled transportation service. Since then, a number of other jurisdictions in the United States (click for map) have passed similar regulations for transportation network companies.

In Ontario, a class action lawsuit has been launched against Uber. Toronto and Edmonton have taken Uber to court, unsuccessfully arguing that Uber is an illegal taxi brokerage. In Ottawa, bylaw officers have laid dozens of fines against drivers who are using the service. In Vancouver, the service was available briefly before being shut down.

At this year's review of the taxi and limousine by-law, a staff person from Uber spoke to the Community and Protective Services Committee and many of the delegations from the public also focused on Uber. The staff report for that meeting and the minutes are available. At that meeting, the following motion, in part, was passed:

b) the matter of new technologies and approaches regarding vehicles for hire BE REFERRED to staff to review and report back at a future meeting of the Community and Protective Services Committee on what is occurring in other jurisdictions, as well as at the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO) and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), and what options might be available to the City of London; it being noted that the City’s primary concerns are health and safety, consumer protection and quality of life, as well as ensuring effective and efficient service delivery;

it being noted that the Community and Protective Services Committee heard the attached presentation from the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services and Chief Building Official, with respect to this matter, and a communication from C. Schafer, Uber Public Policy Manager, Uber Canada, with respect to its ridesharing Canadian operations;

it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the individuals on the attached public participation meeting record made oral submissions with respect to this matter.    (2015-C01)

If you believe the City of London should regulate Uber and other such transportation network companies, please add your name to this petition and share it on social media.


13 signatures so far

Will you sign?

Showing 17 reactions

  • signed 2016-10-30 00:07:00 -0400

    “Level Playing Field "

    They are doing exactly what Taxis are doing. They must not be exempt from any of the rules that taxis have been following for many decades. They completely ignored the law and authority of local government (city council) for two years. Enough is Enough!
  • signed 2016-10-29 20:22:22 -0400
    Should be regulated just like Taxi.
  • signed via 2016-07-28 13:00:54 -0400
  • posted about this on Facebook 2016-07-28 03:34:08 -0400
    Should the city of #ldnont regulate @Uber_Canada? Add your name to the petition!
  • @salliemcfarlane tweeted link to this page. 2016-07-28 03:34:04 -0400
    Should the city of #ldnont regulate @Uber_Canada? Add your name to the petition!
  • signed 2016-07-28 03:33:39 -0400
    As an avid Uber user and taxi customer as well I am well versed in the differences from a rider point of view. As a career business owner, I see the economic impact as well. I am eager and might I say passionate about sharing my views on this topic.
  • posted about this on Facebook 2015-12-27 01:44:27 -0500
    Should the city of #ldnont regulate @Uber_Canada? Add your name to the petition!
  • @tesfayetola tweeted link to this page. 2015-12-27 01:44:20 -0500
    Should the city of #ldnont regulate @Uber_Canada? Add your name to the petition!
  • signed 2015-12-27 01:40:52 -0500
    Regulation is good only to protect the interests of cab owners and taxi companies, not the majority of the poor and exploited cab drivers. Cab owners cannot prove that they have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars on their taxi plates. But the city seems to facilitate transferring plates without asking why and how these transfers are justified, especially when hundreds of drivers are on waiting list for as long as 20 years and above . They cannot provide sales tax receipts and always wonder why the city government defends this unfairness . Every person who makes his/her living through driving taxi and support their families, at least for the past five years, should be provided with a plate and allow the market to be the judge. So, please leave uber alone. It is the only hope for the hopeless driver. Drivers have neither the organization nor the money to lobby for them. You will never hear the voices of the cab driver in any public hearings because of fear that they will lose their Jobs. The people who appear before these public meetings are, the companies, the owners and their highly paid lawyers and lobbyists, who face the city council members pretending as if they were fighting for drivers, and go back to the drivers and act as monstrous bosses. Leave uber alone It is the only freedom for the poor driver. Instead the city should find a way on how it can share some revenue from this innovation and leave the competition open.
  • signed 2015-07-31 16:54:08 -0400
  • signed 2015-07-31 07:36:47 -0400
  • signed 2015-07-29 22:41:17 -0400
  • signed 2015-07-29 21:34:50 -0400
  • signed 2015-07-25 13:11:39 -0400
    Not sure why Uber is different than Checker? Too me it seems like the same intrusion on the taxi industry.

    Never been a taxi driver but those I talk too are not making big dollars.

    Would hate to see the taxi industry crumble just as Uber drivers are losing interest.

    If there are by-laws to be enforced than do so. Don’t let technology get in the way of common sense.
  • signed 2015-07-25 07:32:50 -0400
    We must embrace change progressive leadership is what is required to support innovation!
  • signed 2015-07-24 18:08:20 -0400
  • signed 2015-07-24 16:33:54 -0400
    I’d love to use uber but the fact that they’re unregulated concerns me, and I think our taxis in this city struggle enough to make ends meet (remember AboutTown? )